Chelsea Green Publishing

The Blogging Community at Chelsea Green

The Hydraulic Fracturing Dilemma. And Danger.

Hydraulic fracturing, known as frac’ing, of oil and gas wells has been a common practice for decades yet little is understood about this complex, and potentially very dangerous well treating practice.  In the last 10 to 15 years, more and more questions have been raised by both the environmental community and regulatory agencies, and the industry has characteristically kept most information under wraps, citing proprietary technology as their reasons for concealing specific chemicals and concentrations they use.  In the last several years, concerns of the environmental community have spilled over into the awareness of the general public, fueled by Gasland, a documentary about shale gas drilling and frac’ing produced by Josh Fox in 2010. Before we talk about the controversy of frac’ing, let’s first talk about exactly what it is and how it’s done.  Hydraulic fracturing is a well stimulation technique that increases the production from very tight oil and gas formations.  In the industry “tight” has several meanings, but in this particular case, it means it has low porosity and permeability.  Porosity is the void space or “pore space” within which hydrocarbons reside.  Permeability is the ability of the rock to allow the oil and gas to flow within the rock.  Frac jobs increase relative permeability, allowing more oil and gas to flow to the wellbore, making the well profitable.  It’s generally believed that over 80% of wells drilled today are not economic without hydraulic fracturing.  Here’s a good illustration about how horizontal wells are frac’ed: Watch Video on Youtube. The problems with frac’ing are generally twofold; first, control of the frac fluid within the well is always questionable, depending completely on good well design as well as quality of steel casing and properly applied cement jobs.  As we all witnessed during the BP well blowout, casing quality and cement quality are critical to proper well design, with potential catastrophic consequences if there is a failure.  The second key issue is proper disposal of the frac fluids as they are flowed back from the treated well.  These two issues are greatly exacerbated when hazardous materials (like diesel fuel) are used in the treatment, hence the current controversy over hydraulic fracturing.  There are fears that chemicals from frac jobs can (or already have) reached fresh water aquifers, especially when the oil and gas wells are in close proximity to fresh drinking water sources. Up until just recently, the industry has done what it always does; dismiss concerns about frac’ing as hyperbole with the attendent “it’s just too complicated for you to understand” rhetoric pushed by lobbyists.  This time, though, fueled by Cabot Oil & Gas being fined for contaminating water sources in Pennsylvania, a ban on frac’ing in New York state, and constant pressure from environmental groups, the industry has begun to respond to demands for more transparency.  While still defending the practice of frac’ing as necessary, some companies have begun efforts to use more benign chemicals and disclose ingredients used by service companies.  Energy giant Chesapeake has even started what it calls GreenFrac, a program it claims is designed to reduce the risks to groundwater from hydraulic fracturing. Yesterday, Democratic members of the House Committees on energy, oversight, and natural resources sent a letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, claiming that oil field service companies have pumped over 32 million gallons of diesel fuel as frac fluid from 2005 to 2009 without proper EPA permits.  The letter points out the same difficulties that we witnessed during the BP crisis; lack of communication between service companies and operators, and the lack of risk mitigation and record keeping due to that lack of communication.  The alarming thing about the use of diesel fuel in frac jobs is that virtually everyone, including the industry, had assumed that the practice was stopped in 2003.  Apparently, that is simply not the case. This practice, though necessary to make US oil and gas wells productive, requires much more government oversight and industry disclosure to lower the risk of contamination of precious groundwater resource.  As long as we don’t know what the industry is pumping into the ground and the extent of the damage it may cause, it will be virtually impossible to assure the public that the technique is indeed safe.  It’s time for the industry to take a pause, similar to the pause we continue to experience in the deepwater, and take the time to determine harmful practices and materials, then replace these techniques with safer operations. Read the original post on The Daily Hurricane.
disasteronthehorizon Bob Cavnar is the author of Disaster on the Horizon.

Bob Cavnar is a 30-year veteran of the oil and gas industry with deep experience in operations, start-ups, turn-arounds, and management of both public and private companies. He was most recently President and Chief Executive Officer of Milagro Exploration, a large, privately held oil and gas exploration firm based in Houston, Texas with operations along the Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi Gulf Coasts, and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Cavnar holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Southern Methodist University and completed the Program for Management Development at the Harvard Business School. He blogs at

What’s Changed About Deepwater Drilling Since Macondo? Not a Lot.

April 20th at 9:50 pm central time marked the exact time that BP’s deepwater well named Macondo blew out, killing eleven workers, destroying Transocean’s Deepwater Horizon, and putting 5 million barrels of oil into the water 5,000 feet below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico.  Most of the world has moved on since then, […] Read More..

Arrest of BP Engineer Exposes the Smoking Gun?

Today, the Justice Department arrested a former BP engineer on two counts of obstruction of justice for allegedly destroying hundreds of text messages that included details of flow rate calculations of their blown out Macondo well in the days immediately following the Gulf disaster on April 20, 2010, just over two years ago. The engineer, […] Read More..

The Fight for Equality from MLK to Occupy Wall Street

When it comes to tangibly honoring great Americans, Washington tends to drag its collective feet, usually decades, before making room along the Mall for a tribute. The notable exception is the Viet Nam war memorial that was completed a mere 7 years after the war ended; the impetus to build it so quickly was the […] Read More..

Preliminary Deepwater Horizon Report Rips Transocean, Marshall Islands

(April 23rd) Late yesterday, the Deepwater Horizon Joint Investigation board issued a preliminary report of its findings related to causes of the Macondo well disaster that come under the jurisdiction of the Coast Guard.  This report focused only on the vessel, its condition, and the actions of the crew that caused the explosions and loss […] Read More..

Transocean Execs Shamed into Donating Safety Bonuses, Keep the Rest

You’ve probably heard by now that Transocean announced last week that 2010 was its “best year for safety performance” based on incident rate statistics even though their offshore rig, the Deepwater Horizon, burned down and sank during the largest blowout and oilspill in the history of the US. Eleven workers were killed in the disaster, […] Read More..