Chelsea Green Publishing

The Blogging Community at Chelsea Green

Why coal miners should support carbon-reduction legislation

It is often assumed that coal miners view the possibility of a carbon tax or cap-and-trade program as a threat to their livelihoods. I’m sure that’s true: that they view these as threats. What’s not so clear is whether or not they really are threats. Consider this:
While coal production in the US increased 32 percent between 1980 and 1999, coal-mining employment declined 66 percent, from 242,000 to 83,000 workers. Further, jobs in the coal industry are expected to fall by 36,000 workers between 1995 and 2020, even without any greenhouse gas–reducing policies, such as carbon caps or taxes, in place. [Source: Kammen, Kapadia, and Fripp, “Putting Renewables to Work: How Many Jobs Can the Clean Energy Industry Generate?” p. 14 (pdf)]
Update: the Bureau of Labor Statistics has numbers for 2008. Total employment in coal mining, from CEOs to hoist and winch operators: 78,340, down 5 percent from 1999. In other words, the threat to coal miners’ livelihoods exists even if nothing at all is done to combat global warming. On the other hand, if one of these policies is adopted, it will surely include some kind of “transitional assistance,” such as job training programs, subsidized loans for new businesses starting up or moving into coal producing areas, and so on. That assistance is less likely if climate legislation is blocked. So coal miners have a bleak employment future ahead of them no matter what. The closest thing to a ray of sunshine they can hope for is strong climate legislation that opens the doors to new industries and job opportunities to replace the coal jobs that are already doomed.

I'm an associate editor at Chelsea Green and I like to think about low-tech/appropriate-tech gizmos that I hope to build when I have some spare time. In a previous incarnation, I coauthored the Field Guide to the U.S. Economy. When not at Chelsea Green or biking to work, I live and garden with my family in Norwich, Vermont.


If you need a new blog to follow…

I recommend a new blog from Liz Stanton, Public Goods: The economics of climate, equity and shared prosperity. Stanton is “a senior economist with the Stockholm Environment Institute-U.S. and a research fellow at the Global Development and Environment Institute (GDAE) of Tufts University.” I know her because we were in economics grad school together a […] Read More..

Following up with Allan Savory on using cattle to reverse desertification and global warming

A couple weeks back I linked to the video of a lecture given by Allan Savory, on the topic of “Keeping Cattle: Cause or Cure of Climate Change?” Unexpectedly, and to my delight, a reader of the blog who knows Savory put me in touch with him, and Savory generously agreed to answer questions I […] Read More..

Pigs at the trough and looking beyond local farms

The February Center for Rural Affairs newsletter includes a couple articles especially worth noting. Bad news first: the Obama administration isn’t holding to the President’s campaign promise to clamp down on the loophole that allows unlimited subsidies to go to the biggest farms. In a repudiation of the president’s central campaign pledge on rural policy, […] Read More..

Fascinating lecture: “Keeping Cattle: Cause or Cure of Climate Change?”

Check this out. It’s a lecture by Allan Savory sponsored by Feasta, an Irish organization (“The foundation for the economics of sustainability”). There’s a 10 minute version and a 1 hour version. The full version includes a lot of seriously interesting stuff not in the condensed version. I’d love to have the opportunity to talk […] Read More..

HCR Avatar analogy—and “pass HCR” contingency fund

Maybe lots of other people are making Avatar analogies, but I haven't happened to see them myself. So I'll just throw this out there. (Spoiler alert for people who haven't seen the movie and don't want to know the storyline: avoid this diary entry.) Read More..