Chelsea Green Publishing

The Blogging Community at Chelsea Green

The organic imperative held hostage

“We no longer have the luxury of prevention. Now we are in the dire situation of needing a cure, a reversal. We know that correcting agriculture is an answer to climate chaos, and that it hinges on human behavior. ….The future is underfoot. It’s all about healthy soil.” This statement from ‘Coach’ Mark Smallwood, Executive Director of the Rodale Institute, epitomizes the urgency of the need to convert as much farmland as possible, as quickly as possible, to organic management. The Rodale Institute, a respected independent organic agriculture research organization, has launched a campaign calling for “the restructuring of our global food system with the goal of reversing climate change through photosynthesis and biology,” with the release in April of its new white paper, Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Climate Change: A Down-to-Earth Solution to Global Warming.

The Rodale document takes off from the recent UNCTAD report entitled, “Wake Up Before it is too Late: Make agriculture truly sustainable now for food security in a changing climate” (see   Others, such as Allan Savory (see, have also pointed out the feasibility of sequestering massive quantities of carbon in the form of soil organic matter through relatively simple methods.  All that’s needed is an equally massive, worldwide shift in how food is produced.

Organic farming continues to expand, but not anywhere near quickly enough to stave off increasingly certain ecological disaster. In the forty years since the first organic certification programs were established, consumer demand for organically produced products, and therefore land under organic management, has grown dramatically—especially once regulations were put in place to bring consistency and credibility to the marketplace.  However, at least in the US, demand continues to outstrip supply of organically produced fruits, vegetables, grains, and livestock products.  While about 4% of the US food system is organic, less than 1% of raw agricultural products are produced here.

Regulatory barriers are among the many factors that might explain this gap.  Despite the laudatory push by the National Organic Program (NOP) to implement more ‘sound and sensible’ certification procedures, the level of paper work, time, and expense involved remains a daunting challenge for many farmers.  Beyond this, the standards themselves are not always sound or sensible.

To be sure, following organic standards does not in itself guarantee soil building, and it is not necessary to convert all farms to organic in order to achieve the goals identified by the Rodale Institute.  It is deeply troubling, however, to witness the animosity generated towards organic regulators when they attempt to improve the feasibility of organic conversion.  The recent assault on the NOP for daring to assert its legal authority over the National List is but one example of a misguided and regressive strategy that further erodes the trust in our regulatory bodies by potential organic producers and the general public.

It is too urgent that we convert as many farmers as possible to organic for this possibility to be held hostage by purity-obsessed ‘organic watchdogs,’ demanding that standards be ‘tightened up’ to prevent any possibly synthetic molecule from contacting an organic product.

Rodale Institute press release:

Sad news for the organic vision

I wrote the passage that follows near the end of 2010, in the midst of working on a chapter about the early history of organic certification and my role in it. This experience came to mind when I heard about the abrupt dismissal of Mark Keating, a former National Organic Program (NOP) colleague who had […] Read More..

CONFLICTS OVER ORGANIC STANDARDS Part 3 – What is the future of organic?

Part 2 of this series left off in 2002 with full implementation of the NOP (National Organic Program) twelve years after enacting the OFPA (US organic law), following years of internal and external battles. The general message communicated by the activist community was that the new regulation was far from perfect, but acceptable, but that […] Read More..

CONFLICTS OVER ORGANIC STANDARDS Part 2: Organic standards become law

This is the second of three articles published by The Organic Standard (TOS), an international online publication aimed at public and private organic policy makers, certifiers and businesses.  This part appears in the September, 2010 issue (see Part 1 of this story left off in the late 1980s, as the stage was set for […] Read More..

CONFLICTS OVER ORGANIC STANDARDS– Part I, History of organic standard-setting and controversies

NOTE: This article was published in the August 2010 issue of The Organic Standard, an international on-line publication aimed at policy makers, certifiers and the organic trade, published by Grolink AB, a Swedish consulting company ( This is the first of a three-part series that The Organic Standard (TOS) will publish on the story of […] Read More..

New Roots for Inspiration

I had the good fortune to be able to attend a talk by Wes Jackson on Monday, sponsored by the University of Vermont Department of Plant & Soil Sciences. The room was packed with eager agriculture students as well as local agricultural luminaries such as Fred Magdoff. Among them were John and Nancy Todd, founders […] Read More..